Premium
Canopy leaf area of a mature evergreen Eucalyptus woodland does not respond to elevated atmospheric [ CO 2 ] but tracks water availability
Author(s) -
Duursma Remko A.,
Gimeno Teresa E.,
Boer Matthias M.,
Crous Kristine Y.,
Tjoelker Mark G.,
Ellsworth David S.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.13151
Subject(s) - evergreen , canopy , eucalyptus , environmental science , leaf area index , woodland , deciduous , subtropics , plant litter , tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests , wood production , productivity , litter , climate change , precipitation , water use efficiency , agronomy , atmospheric sciences , biology , ecology , ecosystem , agroforestry , forest management , irrigation , geography , geology , macroeconomics , meteorology , economics
Canopy leaf area, quantified by the leaf area index ( L ), is a crucial driver of forest productivity, water use and energy balance. Because L responds to environmental drivers, it can represent an important feedback to climate change, but its responses to rising atmospheric [ CO 2 ] and water availability of forests have been poorly quantified. We studied canopy leaf area dynamics for 28 months in a native evergreen Eucalyptus woodland exposed to free‐air CO 2 enrichment (the Euc FACE experiment), in a subtropical climate where water limitation is common. We hypothesized that, because of expected stimulation of productivity and water‐use efficiency, L should increase with elevated [ CO 2 ]. We estimated L from diffuse canopy transmittance, and measured monthly leaf litter production. Contrary to expectation, L did not respond to elevated [ CO 2 ]. We found that L varied between 1.10 and 2.20 across the study period. The dynamics of L showed a quick increase after heavy rainfall and a steady decrease during periods of low rainfall. Leaf litter production was correlated to changes in L , both during periods of decreasing L (when no leaf growth occurred) and during periods of increasing L (active shedding of old foliage when new leaf growth occurred). Leaf lifespan, estimated from mean L and total annual litter production, was up to 2 months longer under elevated [ CO 2 ] (1.18 vs. 1.01 years; P = 0.05). Our main finding that L was not responsive to elevated CO 2 is consistent with other forest FACE studies, but contrasts with the positive response of L commonly predicted by many ecosystem models.