z-logo
Premium
Antecedent moisture and temperature conditions modulate the response of ecosystem respiration to elevated CO 2 and warming
Author(s) -
Ryan Edmund M.,
Ogle Kiona,
Zelikova Tamara J.,
LeCain Dan R.,
Williams David G.,
Morgan Jack A.,
Pendall Elise
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.12910
Subject(s) - environmental science , vapour pressure deficit , soil respiration , ecosystem , water content , vegetation (pathology) , atmospheric sciences , precipitation , terrestrial ecosystem , photosynthetically active radiation , carbon cycle , global warming , ecosystem respiration , carbon dioxide , soil water , respiration , climate change , primary production , chemistry , transpiration , ecology , photosynthesis , soil science , botany , biology , geography , pathology , engineering , biochemistry , geotechnical engineering , geology , meteorology , medicine
Terrestrial plant and soil respiration, or ecosystem respiration (R eco ), represents a major CO 2 flux in the global carbon cycle. However, there is disagreement in how R eco will respond to future global changes, such as elevated atmosphere CO 2 and warming. To address this, we synthesized six years (2007–2012) of R eco data from the Prairie Heating And CO 2 Enrichment ( PHACE ) experiment. We applied a semi‐mechanistic temperature–response model to simultaneously evaluate the response of R eco to three treatment factors (elevated CO 2 , warming, and soil water manipulation) and their interactions with antecedent soil conditions [e.g., past soil water content ( SWC ) and temperature (SoilT)] and aboveground factors (e.g., vapor pressure deficit, photosynthetically active radiation, vegetation greenness). The model fits the observed R eco well ( R 2  = 0.77). We applied the model to estimate annual (March–October) R eco , which was stimulated under elevated CO 2 in most years, likely due to the indirect effect of elevated CO 2 on SWC . When aggregated from 2007 to 2012, total six‐year R eco was stimulated by elevated CO 2 singly (24%) or in combination with warming (28%). Warming had little effect on annual R eco under ambient CO 2 , but stimulated it under elevated CO 2 (32% across all years) when precipitation was high (e.g., 44% in 2009, a ‘wet’ year). Treatment‐level differences in R eco can be partly attributed to the effects of antecedent SoilT and vegetation greenness on the apparent temperature sensitivity of R eco and to the effects of antecedent and current SWC and vegetation activity (greenness modulated by VPD ) on R eco base rates. Thus, this study indicates that the incorporation of both antecedent environmental conditions and aboveground vegetation activity are critical to predicting R eco at multiple timescales (subdaily to annual) and under a future climate of elevated CO 2 and warming.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom