Premium
Acclimation of photosynthetic temperature optima of temperate and boreal tree species in response to experimental forest warming
Author(s) -
Sendall Kerrie M.,
Reich Peter B.,
Zhao Changming,
Jihua Hou,
Wei Xiaorong,
Stefanski Artur,
Rice Karen,
Rich Roy L.,
Montgomery Rebecca A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.12781
Subject(s) - temperate climate , boreal , understory , taiga , acclimatization , photosynthesis , deciduous , ecology , environmental science , range (aeronautics) , temperate rainforest , temperate forest , ecosystem , plant functional type , global warming , photosynthetic capacity , biology , atmospheric sciences , climate change , botany , canopy , materials science , composite material , geology
Rising temperatures caused by climate change could negatively alter plant ecosystems if temperatures exceed optimal temperatures for carbon gain. Such changes may threaten temperature‐sensitive species, causing local extinctions and range migrations. This study examined the optimal temperature of net photosynthesis ( T opt ) of two boreal and four temperate deciduous tree species grown in the field in northern Minnesota, United States under two contrasting temperature regimes. We hypothesized that T opt would be higher in temperate than co‐occurring boreal species, with temperate species exhibiting greater plasticity in T opt , resulting in better acclimation to elevated temperatures. The chamberless experiment, located at two sites in both open and understory conditions, continuously warmed plants and soils during three growing seasons. Results show a modest, but significant shift in T opt of 1.1 ± 0.21 °C on average for plants subjected to a mean 2.9 ± 0.01 °C warming during midday hours in summer, and shifts with warming were unrelated to species native ranges. The 1.1 °C shift in T opt with 2.9 °C warming might be interpreted as suggesting limited capacity to shift temperature response functions to better match changes in temperature. However, T opt of warmed plants was as well‐matched with prior midday temperatures as T opt of plants in the ambient treatment, and T opt in both treatments was at a level where realized photosynthesis was within 90–95% of maximum. These results suggest that seedlings of all species were close to optimizing photosynthetic temperature responses, and equally so in both temperature treatments. Our study suggests that temperate and boreal species have considerable capacity to match their photosynthetic temperature response functions to prevailing growing season temperatures that occur today and to those that will likely occur in the coming decades under climate change.