Premium
Evasion of CO 2 from streams – The dominant component of the carbon export through the aquatic conduit in a boreal landscape
Author(s) -
Wallin Marcus B.,
Grabs Thomas,
Buffam Ishi,
Laudon Hjalmar,
Ågren Anneli,
Öquist Mats G.,
Bishop Kevin
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.12083
Subject(s) - streams , environmental science , dissolved organic carbon , hydrology (agriculture) , boreal , evasion (ethics) , carbon dioxide , carbon fibers , environmental chemistry , chemistry , ecology , geology , materials science , computer network , geotechnical engineering , immune system , computer science , immunology , biology , organic chemistry , composite number , composite material
Evasion of gaseous carbon ( C ) from streams is often poorly quantified in landscape C budgets. Even though the potential importance of the capillary network of streams as C conduits across the land–water–atmosphere interfaces is sometimes mentioned, low‐order streams are often left out of budget estimates due to being poorly characterized in terms of gas exchange and even areal surface coverage. We show that evasion of C is greater than all the total dissolved C (both organic and inorganic) exported downstream in the waters of a boreal landscape. In this study evasion of carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) from running waters within a 67 km 2 boreal catchment was studied. During a 4 year period (2006–2009) 13 streams were sampled on 104 different occasions for dissolved inorganic carbon ( DIC ) and dissolved organic carbon ( DOC ). From a locally determined model of gas exchange properties, we estimated the daily CO 2 evasion with a high‐resolution (5 × 5 m) grid‐based stream evasion model comprising the entire ~100 km stream network. Despite the low areal coverage of stream surface, the evasion of CO 2 from the stream network constituted 53% (5.0 (±1.8) g C m −2 yr −1 ) of the entire stream C flux (9.6 (±2.4) g C m −2 yr −1 ) (lateral as DIC , DOC , and vertical as CO 2 ). In addition, 72% of the total CO 2 loss took place already in the first‐ and second‐order streams. This study demonstrates the importance of including CO 2 evasion from low‐order boreal streams into landscape C budgets as it more than doubled the magnitude of the aquatic conduit for C from this landscape. Neglecting this term will consequently result in an overestimation of the terrestrial C sink strength in the boreal landscape.