z-logo
Premium
Predicting the spatio‐temporal distributions of pelagic sharks in the western and central North Pacific
Author(s) -
Kai Mikihiko,
Thorson James T.,
Piner Kevin R.,
Maunder Mark N.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
fisheries oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.016
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1365-2419
pISSN - 1054-6006
DOI - 10.1111/fog.12217
Subject(s) - pelagic zone , oceanography , fishing , seamount , spatial distribution , fishery , geography , sea surface temperature , submarine pipeline , seasonality , environmental science , ecology , geology , biology , remote sensing
Spatio‐temporal modeling estimates a species distribution function that represents variation in population density over space and time. Recent studies show that the approach may precisely identify spatial hotspots in species distribution, but have not addressed whether seasonal hotspots are identifiable using commonly available fishery data. In this study, we analyzed the seasonal spatio‐temporal distribution of pelagic sharks in the western and central North Pacific using fishery catch rates and a generalized linear mixed model with spatio‐temporal effects. Different spatial distribution patterns were observed between two shark species. The hotspots of shortfin mako ( SFM ) appeared in the vicinity of the coastal and offshore waters of Japan and the Kuroshio‐Oyashio transition zone ( TZ ), whereas the hotspots of blue shark ( BSH ) were widely distributed in the areas from the TZ to the waters of the Emperor Seamount Chain. Shortfin mako distribution changes seasonally with clear north‐south movement, which follows higher sea surface temperatures ( SST ). However, preferred spring and summer water temperature was still colder than those in fall and winter, but not as cold as for BSH , which did not show seasonal north‐south movement. BSH exhibits seasonal east‐west movement apparently unrelated to temperature. The spatial fishing effort by season generally follows the seasonal movement of temperature possibly making SFM more vulnerable to the fishery than BSH . These findings could be used to reduce the capture risk of bycatch sharks and to better manage the spatial distribution of fishing for targeted sharks.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here