z-logo
Premium
Is Director Industry Experience Valuable?
Author(s) -
Meyerinck Felix,
Oesch David,
Schmid Markus
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
financial management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.647
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1755-053X
pISSN - 0046-3892
DOI - 10.1111/fima.12089
Subject(s) - endogeneity , unobservable , matching (statistics) , sample (material) , accounting , business , identification (biology) , economics , econometrics , statistics , chemistry , mathematics , botany , chromatography , biology
We investigate whether investor reactions to the announcement of a new outside director appointment significantly depend upon the director's experience in the appointing firm's industry. Our sample includes 688 outside director appointments to boards of S&P 500 companies from 2005 to 2010. We find significantly higher announcement returns upon appointments of experienced versus inexperienced directors. To alleviate endogeneity concerns, we use the deaths of 200 directors holding 280 outside directorships as an identification strategy and find significantly more negative announcement returns associated with the deaths of experienced versus inexperienced directors. However, while our results are robust to accounting for time‐fixed unobservable director and firm characteristics, we still cannot completely rule out endogenous firm‐director matching driving our results.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here