Premium
Static assessment of plain/notched polylactide (PLA) 3D‐printed with different infill levels: Equivalent homogenised material concept and Theory of Critical Distances
Author(s) -
Ahmed Adnan A.,
Susmel Luca
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
fatigue and fracture of engineering materials and structures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.887
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2695
pISSN - 8756-758X
DOI - 10.1111/ffe.12958
Subject(s) - infill , 3d printed , isotropy , materials science , structural engineering , material properties , composite material , engineering , physics , quantum mechanics , biomedical engineering
A novel approach based on the equivalent homogenised material concept and the theory of critical distances is formulated to perform static assessment of plain/notched objects of polylactide (PLA) when this polymer is additively manufactured with different infill levels. The key idea is that the internal net structure resulting from the 3D‐printing process can be modelled by keeping treating the material as linear elastic, continuum, homogenous, and isotropic, with the effect of the internal voids being taken into account in terms of change in mechanical/strength properties. This idea is initially used to assess the detrimental effect of the manufacturing voids on the static strength of the plain (ie, unnotched) material. This is done by addressing this problem in a Kitagawa‐Takahashi setting via the Theory of Critical Distances. Subsequently, this approach is extended to the static assessment of notched components of 3D‐printed PLA; ie, it is used to take into account simultaneously the effect of both manufacturing voids and macroscopic geometrical features. The accuracy and reliability of this design methodology were checked against a large number of experimental data generated by testing, under axial loading, plain specimens, as well as notched samples (including open notches) of PLA. These specimens were manufactured by making the infill level vary in the rage 10% to 90%. This validation exercise allowed us to demonstrate that the proposed approach is highly accurate, returning estimates falling within an error interval of ±20%. This remarkable level of accuracy strongly supports the idea that static assessment of 3D‐printed materials with complex geometries and manufactured with different infill levels can be performed by simply post‐processing conventional linear elastic finite element (FE) solid models, ie, without the need for modelling explicitly the detrimental effect of the manufacturing voids.