Premium
Isotropic‐kinematic hardening framework to assess ratcheting response of steel samples undergoing asymmetric loading cycles
Author(s) -
Karvan P.,
VarvaniFarahani A.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
fatigue and fracture of engineering materials and structures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.887
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2695
pISSN - 8756-758X
DOI - 10.1111/ffe.12905
Subject(s) - hardening (computing) , materials science , isotropy , yield surface , softening , plasticity , structural engineering , strain hardening exponent , kinematics , composite material , mechanics , finite element method , constitutive equation , engineering , physics , classical mechanics , layer (electronics) , quantum mechanics
The present study intends to characterize ratcheting response of several steel alloys subject to asymmetric loading cycles through coupling the Ahmadzadeh‐Varvani kinematic hardening rule with isotropic hardening rules of Lee and Zavrel, Chaboche, and Kang. The Ahmadzadeh‐Varvani kinematic hardening rule was developed to address ratcheting progress over asymmetric stress cycles with relatively a simple framework and less number of coefficients. Inclusion of isotropic hardening rules to the framework improved ratcheting response of materials mainly over the first stage of ratcheting. Lee and Zavrel model (ISO‐I) developed an exponential function to account for accumulated plastic strain as yield surface is expanded over stage I and early stage II of ratcheting. Isotropic models by Chaboche (ISO‐II) and Kang (ISO‐III) encountered yield surface evolution in the framework by introducing an internal variable that takes into account the prior maximum plastic strain range. The choice of isotropic hardening model coupled to the kinematic hardening model is highly influenced by material softening/hardening response.