Premium
Novel FMRP interaction networks linked to cellular stress
Author(s) -
Taha Mohamed S.,
Haghighi Fereshteh,
Stefanski Anja,
NakhaeiRad Saeideh,
Kazemein Jasemi Neda S.,
Al Kabbani Mohamed Aghyad,
Görg Boris,
Fujii Masahiro,
Lang Phillip A.,
Häussinger Dieter,
Piekorz Roland P.,
Stühler Kai,
Ahmadian Mohammad R.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the febs journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.981
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1742-4658
pISSN - 1742-464X
DOI - 10.1111/febs.15443
Subject(s) - stress granule , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , interactome , chromatin , rna binding protein , ribonucleoprotein , ribosome biogenesis , translation (biology) , gene silencing , rna , ribosome , genetics , messenger rna , gene
Silencing of the fragile X mental retardation 1 ( FMR1 ) gene and consequently lack of synthesis of FMR protein (FMRP) are associated with fragile X syndrome, which is one of the most prevalent inherited intellectual disabilities, with additional roles in increased viral infection, liver disease, and reduced cancer risk. FMRP plays critical roles in chromatin dynamics, RNA binding, mRNA transport, and mRNA translation. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms, including the (sub)cellular FMRP protein networks, remain elusive. Here, we employed affinity pull‐down and quantitative LC‐MS/MS analyses with FMRP. We identified known and novel candidate FMRP‐binding proteins as well as protein complexes. FMRP interacted with 180 proteins, 28 of which interacted with its N terminus. Interaction with the C terminus of FMRP was observed for 102 proteins, and 48 proteins interacted with both termini. This FMRP interactome comprises known FMRP‐binding proteins, including the ribosomal proteins FXR1P, NUFIP2, Caprin‐1, and numerous novel FMRP candidate interacting proteins that localize to different subcellular compartments, including CARF, LARP1, LEO1, NOG2, G3BP1, NONO, NPM1, SKIP, SND1, SQSTM1, and TRIM28. Our data considerably expand the protein and RNA interaction networks of FMRP, which thereby suggest that, in addition to its known functions, FMRP participates in transcription, RNA metabolism, ribonucleoprotein stress granule formation, translation, DNA damage response, chromatin dynamics, cell cycle regulation, ribosome biogenesis, miRNA biogenesis, and mitochondrial organization. Thus, FMRP seems associated with multiple cellular processes both under normal and cell stress conditions in neuronal as well as non‐neuronal cell types, as exemplified by its role in the formation of stress granules.