Premium
Conformational flexibility of GRASPs and their constituent PDZ subdomains reveals structural basis of their promiscuous interactome
Author(s) -
Mendes Luis Felipe S.,
Batista Mariana R. B.,
Judge Peter J.,
Watts Anthony,
Redfield Christina,
CostaFilho Antonio J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the febs journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.981
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1742-4658
pISSN - 1742-464X
DOI - 10.1111/febs.15206
Subject(s) - pdz domain , molecular dynamics , stacking , crystallography , biophysics , golgi apparatus , biology , chemistry , biochemistry , organic chemistry , cell , computational chemistry
The Golgi complex is a central component of the secretory pathway, responsible for several critical cellular functions in eukaryotes. The complex is organized by the Golgi matrix that includes the Golgi reassembly and stacking protein (GRASP), which was shown to be involved in cisternae stacking and lateral linkage in metazoan. GRASPs also have critical roles in other processes, with an unusual ability to interact with several different binding partners. The conserved N terminus of the GRASP family includes two PSD‐95, DLG, and ZO‐1 (PDZ) domains. Previous crystallographic studies of orthologues suggest that PDZ1 and PDZ2 have similar conformations and secondary structure content. However, PDZ1 alone mediates nearly all interactions between GRASPs and their partners. In this work, NMR, synchrotron radiation CD, and molecular dynamics (MD) were used to examine the structure, flexibility, and stability of the two constituent PDZ domains. GRASP PDZs are structured in an unusual β 3 α 1 β 4 β 5 α 2 β 6 β 1 β 2 secondary structural arrangement and NMR data indicate that the PDZ1 binding pocket is formed by a stable β 2 ‐strand and a more flexible and unstable α 2 ‐helix, suggesting an explanation for the higher PDZ1 promiscuity. The conformational free energy profiles of the two PDZ domains were calculated using MD simulations. The data suggest that, after binding, the protein partner significantly reduces the conformational space that GRASPs can access by stabilizing one particular conformation, in a partner‐dependent fashion. The structural flexibility of PDZ1, modulated by PDZ2, and the coupled, coordinated movement between the two PDZs enable GRASPs to interact with multiple partners, allowing them to function as promiscuous, multitasking proteins.