Premium
Thiol‐blocking electrophiles interfere with labeling and detection of protein sulfenic acids
Author(s) -
Reisz Julie A.,
Bechtold Erika,
King S. Bruce,
Poole Leslie B.,
Furdui Cristina M.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the febs journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.981
H-Index - 204
eISSN - 1742-4658
pISSN - 1742-464X
DOI - 10.1111/febs.12535
Subject(s) - sulfenic acid , chemistry , thiol , cysteine , iodoacetamide , biochemistry , electrophile , protein carbonylation , tcep , dithiothreitol , reactivity (psychology) , glutathione , combinatorial chemistry , enzyme , phosphine , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , catalysis
Cellular exposure to reactive oxygen species induces rapid oxidation of DNA , proteins, lipids and other biomolecules. At the proteome level, cysteine thiol oxidation is a prominent post‐translational process that is implicated in normal physiology and numerous pathologies. Methods for investigating protein oxidation include direct labeling with selective chemical probes and indirect tag‐switch techniques. Common to both approaches is chemical blocking of free thiols using reactive electrophiles to prevent post‐lysis oxidation or other thiol‐mediated cross‐reactions. These reagents are used in large excess, and their reactivity with cysteine sulfenic acid, a critical oxoform in numerous proteins, has not been investigated. Here we report the reactivity of three thiol‐blocking electrophiles, iodoacetamide, N ‐ethylmaleimide and methyl methanethiosulfonate, with protein sulfenic acid and dimedone, the structural core of many sulfenic acid probes. We demonstrate that covalent cysteine ‐ SOR (product) species are partially or fully susceptible to reduction by dithiothreitol, tris(2‐carboxyethyl)phosphine and ascorbate, regenerating protein thiols, or, in the case of ascorbate, more highly oxidized species. The implications of this reactivity on detection methods for protein sulfenic acids and S ‐nitrosothiols are discussed.