z-logo
Premium
The Family Court–Based Stepping Stones Model of Triage: Some Concerns About Safety, Process, and Objectives*
Author(s) -
Ellis Desmond
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
family court review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.171
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 1744-1617
pISSN - 1531-2445
DOI - 10.1111/fcre.12178
Subject(s) - triage , conflict resolution , process (computing) , mediation , matching (statistics) , resolution (logic) , psychology , computer security , social psychology , medical emergency , computer science , medicine , political science , law , artificial intelligence , operating system , pathology
This article critically evaluates the recommendation that family court–based mandatory mediation incorporated in a tiered service delivery model be replaced by a mandatory screening process incorporated in a stepping stones triage model in which couples are matched with an appropriate conflict resolution proceeding. My conclusion is that implementation of this recommendation should be made contingent upon the willingness of its advocates to address concerns with the safety, process, and objectives as described herein. Key Points for the Family Court Community: Domestic violence screening should be incorporated in the larger triadic process of screening–risk assessment–risk management. A Safety First Rule should be followed in screening couples into or out of conflict resolution proceedings. Screening decisions must be grounded in an empirically validated method of matching couples with appropriate conflict resolution proceedings. Causal mechanisms must be included as items in any risk assessment instrument used in family courts.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here