z-logo
Premium
Managing the accountability–autonomy tensions in university research commercialisation
Author(s) -
Narayan Anil K.,
Northcott Deryl,
Parker Lee D.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
financial accountability and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.661
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1468-0408
pISSN - 0267-4424
DOI - 10.1111/faam.12127
Subject(s) - accountability , autonomy , legitimacy , public relations , context (archaeology) , business , public administration , sociology , political science , politics , paleontology , law , biology
Abstract This article investigates organisational responses to emerging concerns about how accountability–autonomy tensions can be managed within the context of university research commercialisation. The findings suggest that changed expectations of university research practices, which result from the introduction of a commercialisation logic, can be managed via the homogenisation of research goals and strategies. The successful management of accountability–autonomy tensions also depends on utilising the various structures and cultural contexts that can be facilitated by decoupling and bridging strategies. Further, while adopting symbolic systems may enhance legitimacy, failure to implement material practices and provide the appropriate cultural context to manage conflicting relationships may put university commercialisation ambitions at risk.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here