Premium
Sex differences but no evidence of quantitative honesty in the warning signals of six‐spot burnet moths ( Zygaena filipendulae L.) *
Author(s) -
Briolat Emmanuelle Sophie,
Zagrobelny Mika,
Olsen Carl Erik,
Blount Jonathan D.,
Stevens Martin
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/evo.13505
Subject(s) - aposematism , honesty , biology , wing , predation , zoology , botany , mimicry , predator , evolutionary biology , ecology , psychology , social psychology , engineering , aerospace engineering
Abstract The distinctive black and red wing pattern of six‐spot burnet moths ( Zygaena filipendulae , L.) is a classic example of aposematism, advertising their potent cyanide‐based defences. While such warning signals provide a qualitatively honest signal of unprofitability, the evidence for quantitative honesty, whereby variation in visual traits could provide accurate estimates of individual toxicity, is more equivocal. Combining measures of cyanogenic glucoside content and wing color from the perspective of avian predators, we investigate the relationship between coloration and defences in Z. filipendulae , to test signal honesty both within and across populations. There were no significant relationships between mean cyanogenic glucoside concentration and metrics of wing coloration across populations in males, yet in females higher cyanogenic glucoside levels were associated with smaller and lighter red forewing markings. Trends within populations were similarly inconsistent with quantitative honesty, and persistent differences between the sexes were apparent: larger females, carrying a greater total cyanogenic glucoside load, displayed larger but less conspicuous markings than smaller males, according to several color metrics. The overall high aversiveness of cyanogenic glucosides and fluctuations in color and toxin levels during an individual's lifetime may contribute to these results, highlighting generally important reasons why signal honesty should not always be expected in aposematic species.