Premium
Females discriminate against heterospecific sperm in a natural hybrid zone
Author(s) -
Cramer Emily R. A.,
Ålund Murielle,
McFarlane S. Eryn,
Johnsen Arild,
Qvarnström Anna
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/evo.12986
Subject(s) - biology , ficedula , sperm , zoology , mate choice , sperm competition , hybrid zone , female sperm storage , ecology , vertebrate , reproductive success , nest (protein structural motif) , sexual selection , evolutionary biology , mating , demography , population , genetics , gene flow , biochemistry , sociology , gene , genetic variation
When hybridization is maladaptive, species‐specific mate preferences are selectively favored, but low mate availability may constrain species‐assortative pairing. Females paired to heterospecifics may then benefit by copulating with multiple males and subsequently favoring sperm of conspecifics. Whether such mechanisms for biasing paternity toward conspecifics act as important reproductive barriers in socially monogamous vertebrate species remains to be determined. We use a combination of long‐term breeding records from a natural hybrid zone between collared and pied flycatchers ( Ficedula albicollis and F. hypoleuca ), and an in vitro experiment comparing conspecific and heterospecific sperm performance in female reproductive tract fluid, to evaluate the potential significance of female cryptic choice. We show that the females most at risk of hybridizing (pied flycatchers) frequently copulate with multiple males and are able to inhibit heterospecific sperm performance. The negative effect on heterospecific sperm performance was strongest in pied flycatcher females that were most likely to have been previously exposed to collared flycatcher sperm. We thus demonstrate that a reproductive barrier acts after copulation but before fertilization in a socially monogamous vertebrate. While the evolutionary history of this barrier is unknown, our results imply that there is opportunity for it to be accentuated via a reinforcement‐like process.