z-logo
Premium
Breaking linkage between mating compatibility factors: Tetrapolarity in Microbotryum
Author(s) -
Hood Michael E.,
Scott Molly,
Hwang Mindy
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/evo.12765
Subject(s) - biology , mating type , outcrossing , mating system , evolutionary biology , genetics , basidium , mating , sexual reproduction , gene , zoology , pollen , ecology , taxonomy (biology)
Linkage of genes determining separate self‐incompatibility mechanisms is a general expectation of sexual eukaryotes that helps to resolve conflicts between reproductive assurance and recombination. However, in some organisms, multiple loci are required to be heterozygous in offspring while segregating independently in meiosis. This condition, termed “tetrapolarity” in basidiomycete fungi, originated in the ancestor to that phylum, and there have been multiple reports of subsequent transitions to “bipolarity” (i.e., linkage of separate mating factors). In the genus Microbotryum , we present the first report of the breaking of linkage between two haploid self‐incompatibility factors and derivation of a tetrapolar breeding system. This breaking of linkage is associated with major alteration of genome structure, with the compatibility factors residing on separate mating‐type chromosome pairs, reduced in size but retaining the structural dimorphism characteristic for regions of recombination suppression. The challenge to reproductive assurance from unlinked compatibility factors may be overcome by the automictic mating system in Microbotryum (i.e., mating among products of the same meiosis). As a curious outcome, this linkage transition and its effects upon outcrossing compatibility rates may reinforce automixis as a mating system. These observations contribute to understanding mating systems and linkage as fundamental principles of sexual life cycles, with potential impacts on conventional wisdom regarding mating‐type evolution.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here