Premium
Gain and loss of specialization in two oil‐bee lineages, Centris and Epicharis (Apidae)
Author(s) -
Martins Aline C.,
Melo Gabriel A. R.,
Renner Susanne S.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/evo.12689
Subject(s) - biology , malpighiaceae , plantaginaceae , apidae , zoology , botany , ecology , hymenoptera
It is plausible that specialized ecological interactions constrain geographic ranges. We address this question in neotropical bees, Centris and Epicharis , that collect oils from flowers of Calceolariaceae, Iridaceae, Krameriaceae, Malpighiaceae, Plantaginaceae, or Solanaceae, with different species exploiting between one and five of these families, which either have epithelial oil glands or hair fields. We plotted the level of oil‐host specialization on a clock‐dated phylogeny for 22 of the 35 species of Epicharis and 72 of the 230 species of Centris (genera that are not sister genera) and calculated geographic ranges (km 2 ) for 23 bee species based on collection data from museum specimens. Of the oil‐offering plants, the Malpighiaceae date to the Upper Cretaceous, whereas the other five families are progressively younger. The stem and crown groups of the two bee genera date to the Cretaceous, Eocene, and Oligocene. Shifts between oil hosts from different families are common in Centris , but absent in Epicharis , and the direction is from flowers with epithelial oil glands to flowers with oil hairs, canalized by bees’ oil‐collecting apparatuses, suitable for piercing epithelia or mopping oil from hair fields. With the current data, a link between host specialization and geographic range size could not be detected.