z-logo
Premium
No evidence for external genital morphology affecting cryptic female choice and reproductive isolation in Drosophila
Author(s) -
LeVasseurViens Hélène,
Polak Michal,
Moehring Amanda J.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/evo.12685
Subject(s) - biology , reproductive isolation , sex organ , sexual selection , female sperm storage , aedeagus , morphology (biology) , zoology , mating , species complex , evolutionary biology , sperm competition , anatomy , genetics , taxonomy (biology) , phylogenetic tree , population , demography , sociology , gene
Genitalia are one of the most rapidly diverging morphological features in animals. The evolution of genital morphology is proposed to be driven by sexual selection via cryptic female choice, whereby a female selectively uptakes and uses a particular male's sperm on the basis of male genital morphology. The resulting shifts in genital morphology within a species can lead to divergence in genitalia between species, and consequently to reproductive isolation and speciation. Although this conceptual framework is supported by correlative data, there is little direct empirical evidence. Here, we used a microdissection laser to alter the morphology of the external male genitalia in Drosophila , a widely used genetic model for both genital shape and cryptic female choice. We evaluate the effect of precision alterations to lobe morphology on both interspecific and intraspecific mating, and demonstrate experimentally that the male genital lobes do not affect copulation duration or cryptic female choice, contrary to long‐standing assumptions regarding the role of the lobes in this model system. Rather, we demonstrate that the lobes are essential for copulation to occur. Moreover, slight alterations to the lobes significantly reduced copulatory success only in competitive environments, identifying precopulatory sexual selection as a potential contributing force behind genital diversification.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here