Premium
THE INFLUENCE OF POLLINATOR PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND MATE PREFERENCE ON FLORAL DIVERGENCE IN A SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE DAISY
Author(s) -
Jager Marinus L.,
Ellis Allan G.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/evo.12070
Subject(s) - biology , pollinator , evolutionary biology , mating , clade , mating preferences , mate choice , phylogeography , ecology , zoology , pollination , phylogenetics , pollen , genetics , gene
Divergent mate preferences and subsequent genetic differentiation between populations has been demonstrated, but its effects on interspecific interactions are unknown. Associated species exploiting these mate preferences, for example, may diverge to match local preferences. We explore this idea in the sexually deceptive, fly‐mimicking daisy, Gorteria diffusa , by testing for association between genetic structure in the fly pollinator (a proxy for mate preference divergence) and geographic divergence in floral form. If genetic structure in flies influences interactions with G. diffusa , we expect phylogeographically distinct flies to be associated with different floral forms. Flies associated with forms exploiting only feeding behavior often belonged to several phylogeographic clades, whereas flies associated with forms exploiting male‐mating behavior always belonged to distinct clades, indicating the possibility of pollinator‐mediated floral divergence through phylogeographic variation in mating preferences of male flies. We tested this hypothesis with reciprocal presentations using male flies from distinct clades associated with separate floral forms. Results show that males from all clades exhibit similar preferences, making pollinator driven divergence through geographic variation in mate preference unlikely. Males, however, showed evidence of learned resistance to deceptive traits, suggesting antagonistic interactions between plants and pollinators may drive deceptive floral trait evolution in G. diffusa .