Premium
Characterisation of the in vivo interactions between detomidine and methadone in horses: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling
Author(s) -
GozaloMarcilla M.,
Luna S. P. L.,
Moreira da Silva R.,
Crosignani N.,
Lopes N. P.,
Taylor P. M.,
Pelligand L.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
equine veterinary journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 2042-3306
pISSN - 0425-1644
DOI - 10.1111/evj.13031
Subject(s) - detomidine , pharmacodynamics , pharmacokinetics , crossover study , methadone , sedation , anesthesia , chemistry , horse , pharmacology , visual analogue scale , medicine , placebo , xylazine , ketamine , biology , alternative medicine , pathology , paleontology
Summary Background Pharmacokinetic ( PK )/pharmacodynamic ( PD ) modelling offers new insights to design protocols for sedation and analgesia in standing horses. Objectives To evaluate the parameters and interactions between detomidine and methadone when given alone or combined in standing horses. Study design Randomised, placebo‐controlled, blinded, crossover. Methods Eight adult healthy horses were given six treatments intravenously: saline ( SAL ); detomidine (5 μg/kg bwt; DET ); methadone (0.2 mg/kg bwt; MET ) alone or combined with detomidine (2.5 [ MLD ], 5 [ MMD ] or 10 [ MHD ] μg/kg bwt). Venous blood samples were obtained at predetermined times between 0 and 360 min after drug administration. Plasma detomidine and methadone were measured using a single, liquid/liquid extraction technique by liquid chromatography coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer ( LC ‐ MS / MS ). Sequential PK / PD modelling compared rival models, with and without PK and PD interaction between drugs, to fit the PD data including height of the head above the ground ( HHAG ), a visual analogue scale for sedation ( VAS ), electrical ( ET ), thermal ( TT ) and mechanical ( MT ) nociceptive thresholds and gastrointestinal motility ( GIM ) [1]. Results Two and three compartment models best described the PK of detomidine and methadone, respectively. Detomidine decreased its own clearance as well as the clearance of methadone. The interaction of methadone on the effect of detomidine revealed an infra‐additive (partial antagonism) effect for HHAG (α = −1.33), VAS (α = −0.98) and GIM (α = −1.05), a positive potentiation for ET (pot = 0.0041) and TT (pot = 0.133) and a synergistic to additive effect for MT (α = 0.78). Main limitations This is a small experimental study. Conclusions Different PK / PD interactions were demonstrated for each PD parameter and could be modelled in vivo. The modelling of our data will allow us to simulate and predict the effect of constant rate infusions of both drugs for future investigations.