Premium
Factors Affecting Owners' Choice of Nutritional Supplements in Dressage and Eventing Horses
Author(s) -
Gemmill R,
Agar C,
Freeman S,
Hollands T
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
equine veterinary journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 2042-3306
pISSN - 0425-1644
DOI - 10.1111/evj.12267_95
Subject(s) - trainer , demographics , information source (mathematics) , thematic analysis , descriptive statistics , inclusion (mineral) , medicine , psychology , medical education , qualitative research , demography , social psychology , social science , statistics , mathematics , sociology , computer science , programming language
Horse owners are faced with a vast range of supplements and different sources of information. The aim of this study was to evaluate sources of information used by owners/riders when choosing supplements for competition horses, their opinions on different sources of information and evaluation of factors that affect their decisions. Methods A mixed methods (open and closed questions) online questionnaire was distributed through B ritish Eventing and Dressage websites to owners/riders of dressage and/or event horses, to collect data on the demographics of the owner/rider and their horses, sources of information used when choosing nutritional supplements, and their opinion on these different sources. Data was evaluated using descriptive analysis and Chi‐squared tests for quantitative data, and thematic analysis for qualitative data. Results 757 responses met the inclusion criteria, and owners/riders competed at dressage and eventing from unaffiliated novice to affiliated advanced level. Veterinary surgeons were considered the most reliable source of information, followed by nutritionists, research studies, coach/trainer and other horse owners. ‘Other horse owners’ were the top source (18% of participants) for the participants' most recent choice of supplement. Respondents with a higher education qualification were significantly more likely to use research papers as a source of information (P<0.005). Owners/riders under 34 years of age were significantly more likely to use a coach / trainer as a source of information (P<0.005). Conclusions Horse owners identified veterinary surgeons, nutritionists and research papers as reliable sources of information, but ultimately most chose their supplement based on recommendations of other owners or coaches/trainers. Ethical Animal Research The study was reviewed and approved by the School of Veterinary Medicine and Science Ethics Committee at the U niversity of N ottingham. Sources of funding: School of Veterinary Medicine and Science at the U niversity of N ottingham. Competing interests: T eresa H ollands is employed by D odson and H orrell Ltd.