z-logo
Premium
Investigation of bias in an epilepsy machine learning algorithm trained on physician notes
Author(s) -
Wissel Benjamin D.,
Greiner Hansel M.,
Glauser Tracy A.,
Mangano Francesco T.,
Santel Daniel,
Pestian John P.,
Szczesniak Rhonda D.,
Dexheimer Judith W.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
epilepsia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.687
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1528-1167
pISSN - 0013-9580
DOI - 10.1111/epi.16320
Subject(s) - candidacy , epilepsy , medicine , epilepsy surgery , boston naming test , socioeconomic status , surgery , pediatrics , algorithm , population , psychiatry , disease , dementia , environmental health , politics , political science , computer science , law
Racial disparities in the utilization of epilepsy surgery are well documented, but it is unknown whether a natural language processing ( NLP ) algorithm trained on physician notes would produce biased recommendations for epilepsy presurgical evaluations. To assess this, an NLP algorithm was trained to identify potential surgical candidates using 1097 notes from 175 epilepsy patients with a history of resective epilepsy surgery and 268 patients who achieved seizure freedom without surgery (total N = 443 patients). The model was tested on 8340 notes from 3776 patients with epilepsy whose surgical candidacy status was unknown (2029 male, 1747 female, median age = 9 years; age range = 0‐60 years). Multiple linear regression using demographic variables as covariates was used to test for correlations between patient race and surgical candidacy scores. After accounting for other demographic and socioeconomic variables, patient race, gender, and primary language did not influence surgical candidacy scores ( P  >   .35 for all). Higher scores were given to patients >18 years old who traveled farther to receive care, and those who had a higher family income and public insurance ( P  <   .001, .001, .001, and .01, respectively). Demographic effects on surgical candidacy scores appeared to reflect patterns in patient referrals.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here