z-logo
Premium
Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes
Author(s) -
Glauser Tracy,
BenMenachem Elinor,
Bourgeois Blaise,
Cnaan Avital,
Guerreiro Carlos,
Kälviäinen Reetta,
Mattson Richard,
French Jacqueline A.,
Perucca Emilio,
Tomson Torbjorn
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
epilepsia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.687
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1528-1167
pISSN - 0013-9580
DOI - 10.1111/epi.12074
Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , epilepsy , clinical endpoint , meta analysis , psychiatry
Summary The purpose of this report was to update the 2006 International League Against Epilepsy ( ILAE ) report and identify the level of evidence for long‐term efficacy or effectiveness for antiepileptic drugs ( AED s) as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy. All applicable articles from J uly 2005 until M arch 2012 were identified, evaluated, and combined with the previous analysis (Glauser et al., 2006) to provide a comprehensive update. The prior analysis methodology was utilized with three modifications: (1) the detectable noninferiority boundary approach was dropped and both failed superiority studies and prespecified noninferiority studies were analyzed using a noninferiority approach, (2) the definition of an adequate comparator was clarified and now includes an absolute minimum point estimate for efficacy/effectiveness, and (3) the relationship table between clinical trial ratings, level of evidence, and conclusions no longer includes a recommendation column to reinforce that this review of efficacy/evidence for specific seizure types does not imply treatment recommendations. This evidence review contains one clarification: The commission has determined that class I superiority studies can be designed to detect up to a 20% absolute (rather than relative) difference in the point estimate of efficacy/effectiveness between study treatment and comparator using an intent‐to‐treat analysis. Since J uly, 2005, three class I randomized controlled trials ( RCT ) and 11 class III RCT s have been published. The combined analysis (1940–2012) now includes a total of 64 RCT s (7 with class I evidence, 2 with class II evidence) and 11 meta‐analyses. New efficacy/effectiveness findings include the following: levetiracetam and zonisamide have level A evidence in adults with partial onset seizures and both ethosuximide and valproic acid have level A evidence in children with childhood absence epilepsy. There are no major changes in the level of evidence for any other subgroup. Levetiracetam and zonisamide join carbamazepine and phenytoin with level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for adults with partial onset seizures. Although ethosuximide and valproic acid now have level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for children with absence seizures, there continues to be an alarming lack of well designed, properly conducted epilepsy RCT s for patients with generalized seizures/epilepsies and in children in general. These findings reinforce the need for multicenter, multinational efforts to design, conduct, and analyze future clinically relevant adequately designed RCT s. When selecting a patient's AED , all relevant variables and not just efficacy and effectiveness should be considered.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here