Premium
NCME Presidential Address 2020: Valuing Educational Measurement
Author(s) -
Sireci Stephen G.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
educational measurement: issues and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.158
H-Index - 52
eISSN - 1745-3992
pISSN - 0731-1745
DOI - 10.1111/emip.12415
Subject(s) - distrust , competence (human resources) , educational assessment , psychology , core competency , educational measurement , presentation (obstetrics) , educational testing , ethnic group , presidential address , race (biology) , medical education , pedagogy , social psychology , political science , sociology , mathematics education , standardized test , medicine , public administration , law , gender studies , marketing , business , curriculum , psychotherapist , radiology
The community of educational measurement researchers and practitioners has made many positive contributions to education, but has also become complacent and lost the public trust. In this article, reasons for the lack of public trust in educational testing are described, and core values for educational measurement are proposed. Reasons for distrust of educational measurement include hypocritical practices that conflict with our professional standards, a biased and selected presentation of the history of testing, and inattention to social problems associated with educational measurement. The five core values proposed to help educational measurement serve education are: (a) everyone is capable of learning; (b) there are no differences in the capacity to learn across groups defined by race, ethnicity, or sex; (c) all educational tests are fallible to some degree; (d) educational tests can provide valuable information to improve student learning and certify competence; and (e) all uses of educational test scores must be sufficiently justified by validity evidence. The importance of these core values for improving the science and practice of educational measurement to benefit society is discussed.