Premium
Towards a more precise – and accurate – view of eco‐evolution
Author(s) -
Bassar Ronald D.,
Coulson Tim,
Travis Joseph,
Reznick David N.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
ecology letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.852
H-Index - 265
eISSN - 1461-0248
pISSN - 1461-023X
DOI - 10.1111/ele.13712
Subject(s) - ecology , evolutionary dynamics , confusion , evolutionary ecology , term (time) , diversity (politics) , dynamics (music) , biology , epistemology , evolutionary biology , sociology , psychology , philosophy , population , pedagogy , physics , demography , quantum mechanics , anthropology , psychoanalysis , host (biology)
Over the past 15 years, the number of papers focused on ‘eco‐evo dynamics’ has increased exponentially (Figure 1). This pattern suggests the rapid growth of a new, integrative discipline. We argue this overstates the case. First, the terms ‘eco‐evo dynamics’ and ‘eco‐evo interactions’ are used too imprecisely. As a result, many studies that claim to describe eco‐evo dynamics are actually describing basic ecological or evolutionary processes. Second, these terms are often used as if the study of how ecological and evolutionary processes are intertwined is novel when, in fact, it is not. The result is confusion over what the term ‘eco‐evolution’ and its derivatives describe. We advocate a more precise definition of eco‐evolution that is more useful in efforts to understand and characterise the diversity of ecological and evolutionary processes and that focuses attention on the subset of those processes that occur only when ecological and evolutionary timescales are comparable. 1 FigureNumber of papers returned, by year, by a search in Web of Science with the term ‘eco‐evolutionary dynamics' as accessed on 7 January 2021.