z-logo
Premium
Local range boundaries vs. large‐scale trade‐offs: climatic and competitive constraints on tree growth
Author(s) -
Anderegg Leander D. L.,
HilleRisLambers Janneke
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ecology letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.852
H-Index - 265
eISSN - 1461-0248
pISSN - 1461-023X
DOI - 10.1111/ele.13236
Subject(s) - range (aeronautics) , competition (biology) , ecology , climate change , tree (set theory) , spatial ecology , scale (ratio) , environmental science , economic geography , geography , biology , mathematics , mathematical analysis , materials science , cartography , composite material
Species often respond to human‐caused climate change by shifting where they occur on the landscape. To anticipate these shifts, we need to understand the forces that determine where species currently occur. We tested whether a long‐hypothesised trade‐off between climate and competitive constraints explains where tree species grow on mountain slopes. Using tree rings, we reconstructed growth sensitivity to climate and competition in range centre and range margin tree populations in three climatically distinct regions. We found that climate often constrains growth at environmentally harsh elevational range boundaries, and that climatic and competitive constraints trade‐off at large spatial scales. However, there was less evidence that competition consistently constrained growth at benign elevational range boundaries; thus, local‐scale climate‐competition trade‐offs were infrequent. Our work underscores the difficulty of predicting local‐scale range dynamics, but suggests that the constraints on tree performance at a large‐scale (e.g. latitudinal) may be predicted from ecological theory.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here