Premium
Statistical approaches for spatial sample survey: Persistent misconceptions and new developments
Author(s) -
Brus Dick J.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
european journal of soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.244
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2389
pISSN - 1351-0754
DOI - 10.1111/ejss.12988
Subject(s) - variance (accounting) , statistical inference , estimator , independence (probability theory) , computer science , econometrics , population , randomness , inference , statistical model , statistics , sampling design , sample size determination , population variance , sample (material) , sampling (signal processing) , ignorance , mathematics , artificial intelligence , epistemology , philosophy , chemistry , demography , accounting , filter (signal processing) , chromatography , sociology , business , computer vision
Several misconceptions about the design‐based approach for sampling and statistical inference, based on classical sampling theory, seem to be quite persistent. These misconceptions are the result of confusion about basic statistical concepts such as independence, expectation, and bias and variance of estimators or predictors. These concepts have a different meaning in the design‐based and model‐based approach, because they consider different sources of randomness. Also, a population mean is still often confused with a model mean, and a population variance with a model‐variance, leading to invalid formulas for the variance of an estimator of the population mean. In this paper the fundamental differences between these two approaches are illustrated with simulations, so that hopefully more pedometricians get a better understanding of this subject. An overview is presented of how in the design‐based approach we can make use of knowledge of the spatial structure of the study variable. In the second part, new developments in both the design‐based and model‐based approach are described that try to combine the strengths of the two approaches. Highlights Ignorance of fundamental differences between design‐based and model‐based approaches still cause errors in statistical inference. Basic statistical concepts such as independence, variance and bias of an estimator have a different meaning in the two approaches. In estimating and testing it is important to distinguish population parameters from model parameters. Hybrid methods that combine the strengths of the two approaches are reviewed.