z-logo
Premium
Partitioning of sources of N 2 O from soil treated with different types of fertilizers by the acetylene inhibition method and stable isotope analysis
Author(s) -
Lin Wei,
Ding Junjun,
Li Yuzhong,
Zhang Wei,
Ahmad Rasheed,
Xu Chunying,
Mao Lili,
Qiang Xiaojing,
Zheng Qian,
Li Qiaozhen
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
european journal of soil science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.244
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2389
pISSN - 1351-0754
DOI - 10.1111/ejss.12782
Subject(s) - acetylene , denitrification , nitrous oxide , nitrification , chemistry , nitrogen , soil water , environmental chemistry , manure , isotopes of nitrogen , agronomy , environmental science , soil science , biology , organic chemistry
Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is one of the major human‐induced greenhouse gases. It has a large potential for global warming, a long lifetime and can deplete ozone. In China, nitrogenous fertilizer is an important source of N 2 O in agricultural soils, especially in vegetable production, where large amounts of nitrogen fertilizers are commonly used. Isotopomer ratios of N 2 O, oxygen and bulk nitrogen isotope values ( δ 18 O and δ 15 N bulk ) and intramolecular 15 N site preferences (SP) have recently been used to identify the sources of N 2 O. In this study, vegetable farm soil was incubated with manure (M), compound fertilizers (CF) and no fertilizers (NF). The acetylene inhibition method and a 15 N isotopic technique were used to reveal the most likely microbial processes leading to N 2 O emissions. The results showed that the M treatment produced smaller N 2 O emissions than the CF treatment of the soil. Nitrifier denitrification or denitrifier denitrification made the greatest contribution to N 2 O production in the M treatment, accounting for approximately 60–89% of N 2 O production, whereas it was 25–55% and 37–66% in the CF and NF treatments under non‐acetylene conditions, respectively. Under non‐acetylene conditions, N 2 O reduction to N 2 was largest for treatment M (32–90%), intermediate for NF (42–77%) and smallest for CF (20–51%). The results also showed that nitrifier nitrification and N 2 O reduction were partly inhibited under acetylene conditions, with a relative contribution of 9–20% and 0–83% for M, 39–48% and 0–46% for CF, and 25–35% and 0–56% for NF, respectively. Our results suggest that analysing isotopomer ratios of N 2 O with SP would be a practical approach for determining the contributions of microbial processes to N 2 O emissions from different pools in soil. The results revealed that manure produced smaller N 2 O emissions and promoted relatively larger rates of denitrification and N 2 O reduction than compound fertilizers with the same amount of N, which indicated that complementing chemical with manure fertilizers might help to reduce N 2 O emissions on vegetable‐producing land. Highlights We investigated emissions and sources of N 2 O with different types of fertilizers. For the same amount of N, manure produced less N 2 O than compound fertilizer. Stable isotope analysis revealed that denitrification was the dominant process in the manure treatment. The acetylene inhibition method can supplement δ 15 N bulk compared with the SP model to assess N 2 O reduction in soil.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom