z-logo
Premium
Justification, Attachments and Regret
Author(s) -
Corbí Josep E.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
european journal of philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.42
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 1468-0378
pISSN - 0966-8373
DOI - 10.1111/ejop.12265
Subject(s) - regret , normative , perspective (graphical) , dilemma , dynamics (music) , point (geometry) , psychology , social psychology , epistemology , positive economics , economics , philosophy , computer science , mathematics , artificial intelligence , pedagogy , geometry , machine learning
Abstract : In The View From Here , Jay Wallace emphasises that an agent's capacity to regret a past decision is conditioned by the attachments that she may have developed as a result. Those attachments shape the point of view from which she retrospectively deliberates. Wallace stresses, however, that not every normative aspect of her decision is affected by this change in perspective, because her decision will remain as unjustified as it was in the past. I will argue, however, that this approach to justification is inconsistent with the normative import that Wallace ascribes to the actual dynamics of our attachments in his defence of the rationale of regret. If I am right, Wallace's approach is caught in the following dilemma: Either he renounces a nonperspectival approach to justification or he revises his view about the normative import of the actual dynamics of our attachments.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here