z-logo
Premium
The involvement of centralized and distributed processes in sub‐second time interval adaptation: an ERP investigation of apparent motion
Author(s) -
Kaya Utku,
Yildirim Fazilet Zeynep,
Kafaligonul Hulusi
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1111/ejn.13691
Subject(s) - time perception , adaptation (eye) , perception , interval (graph theory) , psychology , context (archaeology) , visual perception , sensory system , neuroscience , auditory perception , communication , audiology , cognitive psychology , biology , medicine , paleontology , mathematics , combinatorics
Abstract Accumulating evidence suggests that the timing of brief stationary sounds affects visual motion perception. Recent studies have shown that auditory time interval can alter apparent motion perception not only through concurrent stimulation but also through brief adaptation. The adaptation after‐effects for auditory time intervals was found to be similar to those for visual time intervals, suggesting the involvement of a central timing mechanism. To understand the nature of cortical processes underlying such after‐effects, we adapted observers to different time intervals using either brief sounds or visual flashes and examined the evoked activity to the subsequently presented visual apparent motion. Both auditory and visual time interval adaptation led to significant changes in the ERP s elicited by the apparent motion. However, the changes induced by each modality were in the opposite direction. Also, they mainly occurred in different time windows and clustered over distinct scalp sites. The effects of auditory time interval adaptation were centred over parietal and parieto‐central electrodes while the visual adaptation effects were mostly over occipital and parieto‐occipital regions. Moreover, the changes were much more salient when sounds were used during the adaptation phase. Taken together, our findings within the context of visual motion point to auditory dominance in the temporal domain and highlight the distinct nature of the sensory processes involved in auditory and visual time interval adaptation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here