z-logo
Premium
Beyond differences in means: robust graphical methods to compare two groups in neuroscience
Author(s) -
Rousselet Guillaume A.,
Pernet Cyril R.,
Wilcox Rand R.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1111/ejn.13610
Subject(s) - toolbox , complement (music) , computer science , scripting language , computational neuroscience , bar chart , function (biology) , artificial intelligence , data science , machine learning , mathematics , statistics , programming language , biology , biochemistry , complementation , evolutionary biology , gene , phenotype
If many changes are necessary to improve the quality of neuroscience research, one relatively simple step could have great pay‐offs: to promote the adoption of detailed graphical methods, combined with robust inferential statistics. Here, we illustrate how such methods can lead to a much more detailed understanding of group differences than bar graphs and t ‐tests on means. To complement the neuroscientist's toolbox, we present two powerful tools that can help us understand how groups of observations differ: the shift function and the difference asymmetry function. These tools can be combined with detailed visualisations to provide complementary perspectives about the data. We provide implementations in R and MATLAB of the graphical tools, and all the examples in the article can be reproduced using R scripts.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom