Premium
Chemogenetic manipulation of ventral pallidal neurons impairs acquisition of sign‐tracking in rats
Author(s) -
Chang Stephen E.,
Todd Travis P.,
Bucci David J.,
Smith Kyle S.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1111/ejn.13103
Subject(s) - psychology , neuroscience
Cues associated with rewarding events acquire value themselves as a result of the incentive value of the reward being transferred to the cue. Consequently, presentation of a reward‐paired cue can trigger reward‐seeking behaviours towards the cue itself (i.e. sign‐tracking). The ventral pallidum ( VP ) has been demonstrated to be involved in a number of motivated behaviours, both conditioned and unconditioned. However, its contribution to the acquisition of incentive value is unknown. Using a discriminative autoshaping procedure with levers, the effects of disrupting VP activity in rats on the emergence of sign‐tracking was investigated using chemogenetics, i.e. Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs ( DREADD s). Transient disruption of VP neurons [activation of the inhibitory hM 4D(Gi) DREADD through systemic injections of clozapine N‐oxide ( CNO ) prior to each autoshaping session] impaired acquisition of sign‐tracking (lever press rate) without having any effect on approach to the site of reward delivery (i.e. goal‐tracking) or on the expression of sign‐tracking after it was acquired. In addition, electrophysiological recordings were conducted in freely behaving rats following VP DREADD activation. The majority of VP units that were responsive to CNO injections exhibited rapid inhibition relative to baseline, a subset of CNO ‐responsive units showed delayed excitation, and a smaller subset displayed a mixed response of inhibition and excitation following CNO injections. It is argued that disruption of VP during autoshaping specifically disrupted the transfer of incentive value that was attributed to the lever cue, suggesting a surprisingly fundamental role for the VP in acquiring, compared with expressing, Pavlovian incentive values.