z-logo
Premium
Threat modulates neural responses to looming visual stimuli
Author(s) -
Vagi Eleonora,
Lourenco Stella F.,
Longo Matthew R.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1111/ejn.12998
Subject(s) - looming , neuroscience , stimulus (psychology) , psychology , perception , visual perception , electroencephalography , sensory system , audiology , cognitive psychology , communication , medicine
Objects on a collision course with an observer produce a specific pattern of optical expansion on the retina known as looming, which in theory exactly specifies the time‐to‐collision ( TTC ) of approaching objects. It was recently demonstrated that the affective content of looming stimuli influences perceived TTC , with threatening objects judged as approaching sooner than non‐threatening objects. Here, the neural mechanisms by which perceived threat modulates spatiotemporal perception were investigated. Participants judged the TTC of threatening (snakes, spiders) or non‐threatening (butterflies, rabbits) stimuli, which expanded in size at a rate indicating one of five TTC s. Visual‐evoked potentials ( VEP s) and oscillatory neural responses measured with electroencephalography were analysed. The arrival time of threatening stimuli was underestimated compared with non‐threatening stimuli, though an interaction suggested that this underestimation was not constant across TTC s. Further, both speed of approach and threat modulated both VEP s and oscillatory responses. Speed of approach modulated the N1 parietal and oscillations in the beta band. Threat modulated several VEP components (P1, N1 frontal, N1 occipital, early posterior negativity and late positive potential) and oscillations in the alpha and high gamma band. The results for the high gamma band suggest an interaction between these two factors. Previous evidence suggests that looming stimuli activate sensorimotor areas, even in the absence of an intended action. The current results show that threat disrupts the synchronization over the sensorimotor areas that are likely activated by the presentation of a looming stimulus.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here