Premium
Atypical cortical representation of peripheral visual space in children with an autism spectrum disorder
Author(s) -
Frey HansPeter,
Molholm Sophie,
Lalor Edmund C.,
Russo Natalie N.,
Foxe John J.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1111/ejn.12243
Subject(s) - neurotypical , autism spectrum disorder , psychology , neuroscience , sensory system , contrast (vision) , autism , eye movement , audiology , visual perception , perception , developmental psychology , medicine , artificial intelligence , computer science
A key feature of early visual cortical regions is that they contain discretely organized retinotopic maps. Titration of these maps must occur through experience, and the fidelity of their spatial tuning will depend on the consistency and accuracy of the eye movement system. Anomalies in fixation patterns and the ballistics of eye movements are well documented in autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ), with off‐center fixations a hallmark of the phenotype. We hypothesized that these atypicalities might affect the development of visuo‐spatial maps and specifically that peripheral inputs might receive altered processing in ASD . Using high‐density recordings of visual evoked potentials ( VEP s) and a novel system‐identification approach known as VESPA (visual evoked spread spectrum analysis), we assessed sensory responses to centrally and peripherally presented stimuli. Additionally, input luminance was varied to bias responsiveness to the magnocellular system, given previous suggestions of magnocellular‐specific deficits in ASD . Participants were 22 ASD children (7–17 years of age) and 31 age‐ and performance‐ IQ ‐matched neurotypical controls. Both VEP and VESPA responses to central presentations were indistinguishable between groups. In contrast, peripheral presentations resulted in significantly greater early VEP and VESPA amplitudes in the ASD cohort. We found no evidence that anomalous enhancement was restricted to magnocellular‐biased responses. The extent of peripheral response enhancement was related to the severity of stereotyped behaviors and restricted interests, cardinal symptoms of ASD . The current results point to differential visuo‐spatial cortical mapping in ASD , shedding light on the consequences of peculiarities in gaze and stereotyped visual behaviors often reported by clinicians working with this population.