Premium
Site‐specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning
Author(s) -
Foerster Águida,
Rocha Sérgio,
Wiesiolek Carine,
Chagas Anna Paula,
Machado Giselle,
Silva Evelyn,
Fregni Felipe,
MonteSilva Katia
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1111/ejn.12079
Subject(s) - transcranial direct current stimulation , neuroplasticity , motor imagery , psychology , supplementary motor area , motor learning , brain stimulation , primary motor cortex , physical medicine and rehabilitation , transcranial magnetic stimulation , neuroscience , dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , motor cortex , prefrontal cortex , stimulation , cognition , medicine , functional magnetic resonance imaging , electroencephalography , brain–computer interface
Mental practice can induce significant neural plasticity and result in motor performance improvement if associated with motor imagery tasks. Given the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation ( tDCS ) on neuroplasticity, the current study tested whether tDCS , using different electrode montages, can increase the neuroplastic effects of mental imagery on motor learning. Eighteen healthy right‐handed adults underwent a randomised sham‐controlled crossover experiment to receive mental training combined with either sham or active anodal tDCS of the right primary motor cortex ( M 1), right supplementary motor area, right premotor area, right cerebellum or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex ( DLPFC ). Motor performance was assessed by a blinded rater using: non‐dominant handwriting time and legibility, and mentally trained task at baseline (pre) and immediately after (post) mental practice combined with tDCS . Active tDCS significantly enhances the motor‐imagery‐induced improvement in motor function as compared with sham tDCS . There was a specific effect for the site of stimulation such that effects were only observed after M 1 and DLPFC stimulation during mental practice. These findings provide new insights into motor imagery training and point out that two cortical targets ( M 1 and DLPFC ) are significantly associated with the neuroplastic effects of mental imagery on motor learning. Further studies should explore a similar paradigm in patients with brain lesions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom