Premium
Early childhood education and care (ECEC) assistants in Europe: Pathways towards continuous professional development (CPD) and qualification[Note 3. This article is based on the NESET II report: ...]
Author(s) -
Peeters Jan,
Sharmahd Nima,
Budginaité Irma
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
european journal of education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.577
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1465-3435
pISSN - 0141-8211
DOI - 10.1111/ejed.12254
Subject(s) - workforce , early childhood education , professional development , pedagogy , corporate governance , quality (philosophy) , political science , public relations , higher education , sociology , medical education , medicine , management , philosophy , epistemology , law , economics
There is broad consensus amongst researchers and international organisations that the quality of early childhood education and care (ECEC), which means the wellbeing of children and families, depends on well‐educated and competent staff. This remains a challenge in Europe, since part of the workforce is also represented by low‐qualified ECEC assistants in many EU countries. In the CoRe study (2011), assistants are defined as ‘invisible workers’, meaning that their presence is usually not taken into account in policy documents and that they have far fewer possibilities of qualification and professional development than core practitioners. Building on the findings of the CoRe study, a recent NESET II report reviewed the profiles of ECEC assistants in 15 European countries and their professionalisation opportunities. This article describes the report's findings, with a focus on the roles of assistants and on how to create coherent pathways towards their qualification and continuous professional development (CPD) opportunities. The latter is shown through the examples of three case studies carried out in Denmark, France and Slovenia. Recommendations for policy makers are included in the conclusions. The framework of the article is the ‘competent system’: as pointed out in the CoRe study, individual competences alone are not sufficient to create quality. A ‘competent system’ is needed which includes collaboration between individuals, teams and institutions and has competent governance at policy level. This means working within a holistic ‘educare’ approach that is able to value the educative role of caring and the caring role of education.