Premium
Self‐assessment of competencies in dental education in Germany – a multicentred survey
Author(s) -
Bitter K.,
Rüttermann S.,
Lippmann M.,
Hahn P.,
Giesler M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
european journal of dental education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.583
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1600-0579
pISSN - 1396-5883
DOI - 10.1111/eje.12165
Subject(s) - respondent , competence (human resources) , medical education , cronbach's alpha , psychology , likert scale , scholarship , medicine , psychometrics , clinical psychology , social psychology , developmental psychology , political science , law
Abstract Introduction The aim was to assess the competencies of undergraduate dental students in Germany in the domains team competence, communicative competence, learning competence and scholarship. Materials and Methods The survey was conducted at 11 dental schools that are equally distributed all over Germany. Competencies were assessed with the Freiburg Questionnaire to Assess Competencies in Medicine ( FCM ) . A short version of the FCM was used in this study. This short form included the four domains: team competence (three items), communicative competence (eight items), learning competence (five items) and scholarship (four items). Students had to rate each item twice: first with regard to the respondent's current level of competence and second with regard to the level of competence that respondents think is required by their job. All items were rated on a five‐point Likert scale (1 ‘very much’ and 5 ‘not at all’). Responsible lecturers from all selected dental schools received another questionnaire to answer the questions whether the FCM domain corresponding learning objectives were taught at the respective dental school. Results A total of 317 undergraduate students from 11 dental schools in their last clinical year participated. The response rate varied between 48% and 92%. Cronbach's α for the FCM scales addressing the current level of competencies ranged from 0.70 to 0.89 and for the scales measuring the presumed level of competencies demanded by their job ranged from 0.72 to 0.82. The mean values of the scales for the assessment of the presumed level of competencies demanded by the job were significantly lower compared to the mean values of the scales for the current level of competencies ( P < 0.001 in all analyses). We found large differences between the two levels – in terms of ‘standardised response means’ ( SRM ) – in the domains team competence ( SRM 1.34), learning competence ( SRM 1.27) and communicative competence ( SRM 1.18). Overall, the learning objectives that correspond to the assessed domains of competencies were taught to 19.6% completely, to 55.4% partially and to 25% not at all at the participating dental schools. Conclusion The results of the present survey revealed that the participating students perceived deficiencies in all domains of competencies. These results indicate that the assessed domains are still barely integrated into dental medicine curricula in Germany and that further research in this field is needed.