Premium
Can the results of the OSCE predict the results of clinical assessment in dental education?
Author(s) -
Näpänkangas R.,
KaraharjuSuvanto T.,
Pyörälä E.,
Harila V.,
Ollila P.,
Lähdesmäki R.,
Lahti S.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
european journal of dental education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.583
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1600-0579
pISSN - 1396-5883
DOI - 10.1111/eje.12126
Subject(s) - objective structured clinical examination , medicine , dentistry , endodontics , prosthodontics , cronbach's alpha , restorative dentistry , test (biology) , fixed prosthodontics , educational measurement , reliability (semiconductor) , orthodontics , psychology , medical education , curriculum , clinical psychology , psychometrics , paleontology , pedagogy , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
The aims of this study were to evaluate the correlation between the results of the objective structured clinical examination ( OSCE ) and clinical assessment and to test the reliability of OSCE test stations. Material and methods All 4th year undergraduate dental students ( n = 47, 100%) attended the OSCE in April 2010. The students were divided into two groups (morning group, group 1; afternoon group, group 2). Groups 1 and 2 were also divided into two subgroups that attended the stations in two concurrent sessions (A and B). The OSCE included 12 10‐min test stations. Clinical assessment was based on long‐term observation during the semesters. The disciplines assessed were cross‐infection control, endodontics, paediatric dentistry, periodontology, prosthodontics and restorative dentistry. Results Statistical analysis using Cronbach's alpha indicated good reliability of the OSCE . The correlation between the results of the OSCE and clinical assessment in the 4th year was statistically significant in cross‐infection control (ρ = 0.340, P = 0.022), endodontics (ρ = 0.298, P = 0.047), prosthodontics (ρ = 0.296, P = 0.048) and restorative dentistry (ρ = 0.376, P = 0.011). Clinical assessment in the 5th year correlated with the OSCE results statistically significant in restorative dentistry (ρ = 0.522, P = 0.001). Conclusion Both the OSCE and constant longitudinal assessment are needed in clinical assessment, as they both play an important role in the overall assessment.