Premium
The role of key workers in improving physical health in first episode psychosis: A scoping review
Author(s) -
Lim Jayleigh,
McCombe Geoff,
Harrold Aine,
Brown Katherine,
Clarke Mary,
Hanlon David,
Hennessy Liam,
O'Brien Sinead,
Lyne John,
Corcoran Ciaran,
McGorry Patrick,
Cullen Walter
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
early intervention in psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.087
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1751-7893
pISSN - 1751-7885
DOI - 10.1111/eip.12937
Subject(s) - psychosocial , psychological intervention , medicine , population , psychology , multidisciplinary approach , psychiatry , gerontology , environmental health , social science , sociology
Aim Studies have demonstrated that a majority of the decline in health status and functioning emerges during the first few years following the onset of psychosis. This knowledge led to the development of specialized early intervention services (EIS) targeting patients experiencing their first episode of psychosis (FEP). The central component of EIS is often assertive case management delivered by a multidisciplinary team, where an appointed key worker is responsible for coordinating treatment and delivering various psychosocial interventions to service users. The aim of this scoping review was to examine how key workers can enhance the physical health outcomes in people with FEP by addressing the factors associated with increased mortality in this population. Methods The scoping review framework comprised a five‐stage process developed by Arksey and O'Malley. The search process was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses. Results A total of 27 studies conducted across 10 countries were analysed. These studies discussed the various ways in which key workers can mediate enhancements in the various factors contributing to the increased mortality rates in FEP patients. Conclusions A broad range of key worker‐mediated outcomes was identified, which were broadly classified into three themes: influences on lifestyle, influences on effects of psychosis and influences on organizational barriers. Our findings suggest that key workers primarily mediated the amelioration of psychosis‐induced effects and the reduction of organizational barriers. Further trials of key worker interventions to enhance physical health outcomes in this cohort are warranted.