Premium
Essential ingredients of engagement when working alongside people after their first episode of psychosis: A qualitative meta‐synthesis
Author(s) -
Tindall Rachel M.,
Simmons Magenta B.,
Allott Kelly,
Hamilton Bridget E.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
early intervention in psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.087
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1751-7893
pISSN - 1751-7885
DOI - 10.1111/eip.12566
Subject(s) - psycinfo , disengagement theory , qualitative research , psychology , medline , service (business) , medicine , psychotherapist , gerontology , sociology , political science , social science , law , economy , economics
Aim Early intervention services (EISs) for first‐episode psychosis (FEP) have been established internationally, however, service disengagement is a recurrent concern resulting in unplanned treatment cessation. The implications of this are far‐reaching due to the financial and personal costs associated with untreated symptoms. The aim of this meta‐synthesis was to collect, interpret and synthesize qualitative research about how engagement is experienced within EISs for FEP. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Emcare from date of conception to November 2016. Following initial screening, 91 abstracts and 13 full texts were reviewed for eligibility. Nine studies were then critically appraised using the CASP tool for qualitative studies, data were systematically extracted and results were synthesized using constant comparison and reciprocal translational analysis. Results Nine qualitative studies explored engagement with EISs, from the perspectives of service users and their caregivers. No studies were found from the perspectives of clinicians or services. All 9 studies employed an inductive methodology, within an interpretivist epistemology. Five main themes were identified: experiences of finding help; factors promoting engagement; the therapeutic relationship; the role of caregivers in supporting engagement; and factors impacting ongoing engagement. Conclusions There is a critical need to stimulate discussion around this multifaceted phenomenon, including a continued focus on the roles of key stakeholders and clinical models that may further facilitate collaboration in treatment plans and recovery.