Premium
Resource use by juvenile brown trout and A lpine bullhead: influence of interspecific versus intraspecific competition
Author(s) -
Louhi Pauliina,
MäkiPetäys Aki,
Huusko Ari,
Muotka Timo
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
ecology of freshwater fish
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1600-0633
pISSN - 0906-6691
DOI - 10.1111/eff.12072
Subject(s) - trout , brown trout , intraspecific competition , biology , interspecific competition , salmo , habitat , competition (biology) , ecology , juvenile , overwintering , juvenile fish , fishery , ictalurus , fish <actinopterygii> , catfish
Stream‐dwelling salmonids and bullheads occupy similar resource niches in northern rivers. It is therefore tempting to assume that they might be involved in a competitive interaction, with potential implications for the habitat use and growth of brown trout ( S almo trutta ). We conducted artificial‐stream experiments to test whether a putative competitor, A lpine bullhead ( C ottus poecilopus ), had an effect on the habitat use of under‐yearling (0+) and yearling (1+) trout. We hypothesised that (i) 1+ trout would be competitively superior to 0+ trout, forcing the younger fish to suboptimal habitats, and that (ii) bullhead might affect the habitat use and prey selection of 0+ trout but less so that of 1+ trout. Against our predictions, no effect of bullhead was found on the habitat use of either age class of brown trout. Instead, yearling trout seemed to force bullheads to suboptimal microhabitats with high current velocities. Presence of yearlings also decreased the growth of under‐yearling fish and caused a shift in their diet composition. These findings suggest that competitive interactions may not limit the coexistence of brown trout and bullheads in boreal rivers. Intraspecific interactions between trout age classes may be more important, with potentially detrimental effects on the growth and overwintering success of 0+ trout.