Premium
The effects of host plant species on adult oviposition and larval performance of the aphid predator Aphidoletes aphidimyza
Author(s) -
Mohl Emily K.,
Stenoien Carl M.,
Heimpel George E.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
ecological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.865
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1365-2311
pISSN - 0307-6946
DOI - 10.1111/een.12836
Subject(s) - biology , host (biology) , aphid , predation , generalist and specialist species , predator , herbivore , foraging , larva , context (archaeology) , ecology , zoology , botany , habitat , paleontology
1. Although preference–performance relationships in insects are typically studied in a bi‐trophic context, it is well known that host plants can affect both the preference and performance of natural enemies of herbivorous insects. 2. This study presents evidence from field and laboratory studies that two species of milkweeds, the putatively less defended Asclepias incarnata and the putatively more defended Asclepias syriaca , differentially affect adult oviposition and larval performance in Aphidoletes aphidimyza , an aphid‐feeding predatory midge, independent of aphid density. 3. Host plant species affected predatory fly larvae abundance by a factor of 50 in the field and a factor of 8 in the laboratory. Larval and adult emergence rates in our laboratory studies provided strong evidence for reduced performance on A. syriaca . Oviposition in choice and no‐choice settings provided some evidence for preference for A. incarnata , and a potentially suppressive effect of A. syriaca . 4. The results provide limited support for the hypothesis that natural selection can lead to positive correlations between adult oviposition preferences and larval performance upon various food sources, even when predatory insects oviposit onto host plants of their herbivorous prey. 5. Preference and performance are not perfectly aligned in this system, however, because ovipositing females do not reject A. syriaca entirely. Potential explanations for mismatches between preference and performance in this system include the neural constraints associated with being a generalist, adaptive time‐limited foraging strategies, and unique evolutionary histories of laboratory colonies compared with wild insects.