Premium
Volatiles from non‐host aromatic plants repel tea green leafhopper E mpoasca vitis
Author(s) -
Zhang Zhengqun,
Luo Zongxiu,
Gao Yu,
Bian Lei,
Sun Xiaoling,
Chen Zongmao
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
entomologia experimentalis et applicata
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.765
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1570-7458
pISSN - 0013-8703
DOI - 10.1111/eea.12236
Subject(s) - biology , leafhopper , green leaf volatiles , population , pest analysis , host (biology) , intercropping , botany , hemiptera , terpenoid , horticulture , agronomy , ecology , demography , herbivore , sociology
Abstract The tea green leafhopper, E mpoasca vitis G öthe ( H emiptera: C icadellidae), is a serious pest of tea crops in C hina. The effectiveness of five aromatic non‐host plants, C orymbia citriodora ( H ook.) ( M yrtaceae), O cimum basilicum L . ( L amiaceae), L avandula pinnata L . ( L amiaceae), R uta graveolens L . ( R utaceae), and R osmarinus officinalis L . ( L amiaceae), was investigated to determine their ability to suppress E . vitis on tea plants. Volatile organic compounds derived from L . pinnata , R . officinalis , and C . citriodora were found to repel leafhoppers and to mask the host's odors. Intercropping L . pinnata and C . citriodora with tea plants significantly reduced the E . vitis population levels in the tea plantation associated with higher population densities of generalist predators. The volatile compounds from the five non‐host plants were collected by headspace absorption under field conditions, and the 10 major components were identified. Qualitative and quantitative differences were found among the five odor profiles. Moreover, the emission dynamics of non‐host volatiles were monitored. Non‐host volatile emissions showed two peak periods, one in the spring and one in the autumn period. These peaks were almost consistent with the population dynamics of E . vitis . Our findings suggested that this newer approach to ecologically based, sustainable pest management implemented via intercropping with non‐host aromatic plants such as L . pinnata and C . citriodora offers a promising alternative to chemical control of the leafhopper population.