Premium
The Politics of Opting Out in the Age of Neoliberal Cynicism
Author(s) -
WheelerBell Quentin
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
educational theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.21
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1741-5446
pISSN - 0013-2004
DOI - 10.1111/edth.12428
Subject(s) - cynicism , politics , civil rights , opt out , capitalism , political science , sociology , neoliberalism (international relations) , value (mathematics) , political economy , law , law and economics , world wide web , computer science , machine learning
Within the past several years, parents, teachers, students, and community members have vociferously debated the value and importance of opting out of standardized testing. The debate has been sparked by an increasing number of parents, dubbed “opt‐out activists,” who refuse to have their children participate in federally mandated standards testing. However, an assortment of civil rights organizations and activists have challenged the opt‐out movement. Quentin Wheeler‐Bell argues that the debate between those in the opt‐out movement and the civil rights activists is an example of neoliberal cynicism. While both groups acknowledge (to different degrees) the structural problems inherent to the current testing regime, they both also make educational demands that assume equal educational opportunity is achievable within a capitalist system. In making this assumption that equal educational opportunity is valuable within capitalism, Wheeler‐Bell concludes, both sides ultimately reproduce neoliberal cynicism.