Premium
Effect on thickness of a single‐layer mouthguard of positional relationship between suction port of the vacuum forming device and the model
Author(s) -
Takahashi Mutsumi,
Bando Yogetsu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
dental traumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1600-9657
pISSN - 1600-4469
DOI - 10.1111/edt.12646
Subject(s) - mouthguard , suction , port (circuit theory) , tray , molar , materials science , composite material , orthodontics , dentistry , mechanical engineering , engineering , medicine
Background/Aim Wearing a mouthguard reduces the risk of sport‐related injuries, but the thickness has a large effect on its efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on the thickness of a single‐layer mouthguard of the positional relationship between the suction port of the vacuum forming device and the model. Materials and Methods Ethylene‐vinyl‐acetate sheets of 4.0‐mm‐thickness and a vacuum forming machine were used. Two hard plaster models were prepared: Model A was 25‐mm at the anterior teeth and 20‐mm at the molar, and model B was trimmed so the bucco‐lingual width was half that of model A. Three model positions on the forming table were examined: (a) P20, where the model anterior rim was located in front of the suction port, (b) P30, where the model anterior rim and front edge of the suction port were close, and (c) P43, where the model anterior rim and palatal rim were located on the suction port. Six mouthguards were fabricated for each condition. Thickness differences due to model form and model position were analyzed. Results Thickness differences due to model form were observed at the incisal edge and labial surface, and model A was significantly thicker than model B in P43 ( P< .01). The thickness of the incisal edge and labial surface was significantly greatest in P43 for model A, but in P30 for model B. Conclusions The effect of the model position on the forming table on suppressing the labial thickness reduction of the mouthguard depended on the bucco‐lingual width of the model. It is important to position the model anterior rim away from the sheet frame if the bucco‐lingual width of the model is large and to place the model anterior rim in front of the suction port if the width is small.