Premium
Fabrication method to maintain mouthguard thickness regardless of the model angle
Author(s) -
Takahashi Mutsumi,
Bando Yogetsu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
dental traumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1600-9657
pISSN - 1600-4469
DOI - 10.1111/edt.12584
Subject(s) - mouthguard , thermoforming , materials science , calipers , fabrication , composite material , mechanical engineering , dentistry , engineering , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology
Abstract Background/Aim The safety and effectiveness of mouthguards depend on the sheet material and thickness. The aim of this study was to investigate the fabrication method for a mouthguard with appropriate thickness using a single sheet regardless of the model angle. Materials and methods Mouthguards were thermoformed using 4.0 mm thick ethylene vinyl acetate sheets and a vacuum forming machine. The working models were three hard plaster models trimmed so that the angle of the anterior teeth to the model base was 90°, 100°, and 110°. The model position was 40 mm from the front of the forming unit. The sheet was softened until it sagged 15 mm, after which the sheet frame was lowered to cover the model. Next, the vacuum was turned on and held for 30 seconds for the control. Under the forming conditions in which the model position (MP) was moved, after the model was covered with the sheet, a scissors handle was positioned at the rear of the model and used to push it forward 20 mm, and then, the vacuum switch was turned on for 30 seconds. Six specimens were formed for each condition. Mouthguard thickness after formation was measured using a specialized caliper. The differences in mouthguard thickness due to forming conditions and model angle were analyzed. Results The MP was significantly thicker than the control in each model ( P < .01). The mouthguard thickness tended to decrease as the model angle increased. The average thickness of the labial surface in the MP was 3 mm or more and was not affected by the model angle. Conclusions This study suggested that the fabrication method in which moving the model forward by 20 mm just before formation could produce a mouthguard with approximately 3 mm thickness on the labial side with a single sheet regardless of the model angle.