z-logo
Premium
Damaging democracy? Security provision and turnout in Afghan elections †
Author(s) -
Condra Luke N.,
Callen Michael,
Iyengar Radha K.,
Long James D.,
Shapiro Jacob N.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
economics and politics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1468-0343
pISSN - 0954-1985
DOI - 10.1111/ecpo.12128
Subject(s) - turnout , afghan , legitimacy , political science , polling , democracy , democratization , public administration , government (linguistics) , national security , political economy , security forces , politics , voting , law , sociology , philosophy , linguistics , computer science , operating system
In emerging democracies, elections are encouraged as a route to democratization. However, not only does violence often threaten these elections, but citizens often view as corrupt the security forces deployed to combat violence. We examine the effects of such security provision. In Afghanistan's 2010 parliamentary election, polling centers with similar histories of pre‐election violence unintentionally received different deployments of the Afghan National Police, enabling identification of police's effects on turnout. Using data from the universe of polling sites and various household surveys, data usually unavailable in conflict settings, we estimate increases in police presence decreased voter turnout by an average of 30%. Our results adjudicate between competing theoretical mechanisms through which security forces could affect turnout, and show behavior is not driven by voter anticipation of election‐day violence. This highlights a pitfall for building government legitimacy via elections in weakly institutionalized and conflict‐affected states.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here