Open AccessResolution in species distribution models shapes spatial patterns of plant multifaceted diversity
Author(s) -
Chauvier Yohann,
Descombes Patrice,
Guéguen Maya,
Boulangeat Louise,
Thuiller Wilfried,
Zimmermann Niklaus E.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
ecography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.973
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1600-0587
pISSN - 0906-7590
DOI - 10.1111/ecog.05973
Subject(s) - biodiversity , ecology , ecological niche , species distribution , phylogenetic diversity , robustness (evolution) , habitat , diversity (politics) , species diversity , environmental niche modelling , biology , geography , phylogenetic tree , biochemistry , sociology , anthropology , gene
Species distribution models (SDMs) are statistical tools that relate species observations to environmental conditions to retrieve ecological niches and predict species' potential geographic distributions. The quality and robustness of SDMs clearly depend on good modelling practices including ascertaining the ecological relevance of predictors for the studied species and choosing an appropriate spatial resolution (or ‘grain size'). While past studies showed improved model performance with increasing resolution for sessile organisms, there is still no consensus regarding how inappropriate resolution of predictors can impede understanding and mapping of multiple facets of diversity. Here, we modelled the distribution of 1180 plant species across the European Alps for two sets of predictors (climate and soil) at resolutions ranging from 100‐m to 40‐km. We assessed predictors' importance for each resolution, calculated taxonomic (TD), relative phylogenetic (rPD) and functional diversity (rFD) accordingly, and compared the resulting diversities across space. In accordance with previous studies, we found the predictive performance to generally decrease with decreasing predictor resolution. Overall, multifaceted diversity was found to be strongly affected by resolution, particularly rPD, as exhibited by weak to average linear relationships between 100‐m and 1‐km resolutions (0.13 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.57). Our results demonstrate the necessity of using highly resolved predictors to explain and predict sessile species distributions, especially in mountain environments. Using coarser resolution predictors might cause multifaceted diversity to be strongly mispredicted, with important consequences for biodiversity management and conservation.