Open AccessFunctional and phylogenetic structure of forest and savanna bird assemblages across spatial scales
Author(s) -
Sobral Fernando L.,
Cianciaruso Marcus V.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
ecography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.973
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1600-0587
pISSN - 0906-7590
DOI - 10.1111/ecog.00903
Subject(s) - null model , phylogenetic tree , ecology , species richness , biological dispersal , habitat , biology , community structure , community , spatial ecology , population , demography , sociology , biochemistry , gene
Ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that drive community assembly vary in space and time. However, little is known about how such mechanisms act in contrasting habitats. Here, we estimated the functional and phylogenetic structure of forest and savanna bird assemblages across different spatial scales to understand: 1) the mechanisms that govern the structure of assemblages in these habitats; 2) the relationship between phylogenetic and functional structure; and 3) the influence of species richness on the functional and phylogenetic structure of assemblages. We used a null model where forest and savanna bird species were allowed to occur in the same null assemblages and other where species were separated based on their habitats. According to the first null model, forest bird assemblages were functionally and phylogenetically clustered at all spatial scales, whereas savanna bird assemblages generally showed random functional and phylogenetic structure. These results can be explained by the low dispersal rate of forest species across of the patchy habitats and the widespread distribution of savanna species. However, in the second null model, both forest and savanna bird assemblages showed random functional and phylogenetic structure at regional and local scales. This suggests that trait‐based assembly might not play an important role in both habitats and across different spatial scales. In addition, the phylogenetic and functional structure of assemblages were not correlated, evidencing that caution is necessary when using phylogenetic relationships as a surrogate to functional distances among species. Finally, the relationships between species richness and functional and phylogenetic structure indicated that an increase in the number of species can promote both clustering and overdispersion, depending on the studied habitat and scale. Our study shows that integrating different types of habitat, spatial scales and biodiversity components in a single framework can shed light on the mechanisms that determine the community assembly.