Premium
Ticagrelor and prasugrel are independent predictors of improved long‐term survival in ACS patients
Author(s) -
Gager Gloria M.,
Jilma Bernd,
Winter MaxPaul,
Hengstenberg Christian,
Lang Irene M.,
Toma Aurel,
Prüller Florian,
Wallner Markus,
Kolesnik Ewald,
Lewinski Dirk,
SillerMatula Jolanta M.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
european journal of clinical investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.164
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1365-2362
pISSN - 0014-2972
DOI - 10.1111/eci.13304
Subject(s) - prasugrel , clopidogrel , medicine , ticagrelor , mace , acute coronary syndrome , cardiology , myocardial infarction , p2y12 , interquartile range , hazard ratio , percutaneous coronary intervention , confidence interval
Aim To investigate the long‐term clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with potent P2Y12 inhibitors compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods In this prospective multicenter observational study, we enrolled 708 patients with ACS treated with clopidogrel (n = 137), ticagrelor (n = 260) or prasugrel (n = 311). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE; over 1 year) and long‐term mortality (median: 5.6 years; interquartile range [IQR] 4.9‐6.5 years) were assessed. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) was used to measure adenosine diphosphate (ADP)‐ and arachidonic acid (AA)‐induced platelet aggregation. Results Type of P2Y12 inhibitor emerged as an independent predictor of long‐term mortality and MACE: patients treated with potent platelet inhibitors prasugrel or ticagrelor were at lower risk for long‐term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22‐0.92; P = .028) or MACE (adjusted HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20‐0.73; P = .004) than those treated with clopidogrel independent from clinical risk factors. In contrast, the efficacy of clopidogrel decreased with increasing severity of ACS: platelet aggregation was 37% higher in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 25% higher in patients with non‐ST elevation myocardial infarction (non‐STEMI) compared to patients with unstable angina ( P = .039). Patients with diabetes achieved less potent ADP‐ and AA‐induced platelet inhibition under clopidogrel, compared to patients without diabetes ( P = .045; P = .030, respectively). Conclusion In the setting of ACS, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel reduced long‐term mortality and 1‐year MACE as compared to clopidogrel.